sometimes, i really find that the textbook board back home is a joke.
no record of the existence of puteri hang li po? then why would it be included in the textbook? this only reflects
(i) how certain authors did not really do a good job while researching on the topic
(ii) that the historians did a poor job in distinguishing myth from history
this is plain pathetic-ness.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment